Bring cannons, quarrellers, and thunderers, then rain fire upon your enemy before they even reach your lines.

Without them, you're gimping your damage output significantly. See what I mean? Even Grave Guards barely edge out Dwarf Warriors with their 36 MD and 145 Armor, meanwhile Ironbreakers have a staggering 68 MD and 155 Armor.īecause the Dwarf playstyle was meant to include cannons and ranged weapons. The basic Dwarf Warrior has 38 melee defense and 115 armor. That's not true at all? I get that's your perception, but statistically Dwarf infantry have among the best melee defense and armor values of any melee infantry unit in the game. Автор сообщения: Max SteinerWy do i want to play a defence orianted clan? When my defence troops is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥? Dwarf melee units exist to protect your ranged units and artillery, which is where the dwarves shine (seriously, even quarellors with a master engineer will wreck most low armored armies.) (honestly, they're probably the easiest faction for the dwarves to beat) because you'll either fight them when their tech trees are low or you'll fight them when your tech tree is so high you can withstand any charge.Īs a whole, remember that dwarves are a defensive faction. Point being is that in campaign, Dwarves can easily wipe vampires and beastmen. Dwarf Tier 4 are designed to hold a line (such as in the case of the ironbreakers etc) or harass/snipe (such as Gyros). Vamp and beastmen are offense designed and serve the role of charging (for the most part). Dwarf tier 4 serve a different role than Vamps and Beastmen.

This is not true in campaign, as the dwarf tech tree makes them incredibly powerful (seriously, the end of the tree will buff your tier 4 to near god levels Dwarves are widely considered the most underpowered armies in multiplayer anyways, so your not wrong there.

Honga warhammer